This has been discussed mainly on telegram before, so I would like to lay out my reasoning and how such a proposal could be formulated on this forum.
The problem in my opinion (and the opinion of others) is that rewards changes to the different lending and trading pools are decided by exchequer alone. I realize that the goal of everyone including exchequer, and also those opposed to the latest decisions, is to increase the token value. Exchequer wants to do that by reducing emissions, while I, and several others, think that emissions are a marketing cost at this stage to attract more users, and that after the end of SIP-24 (which I agreed with), the emissions to reward pool participants are already low enough overall, and a further reduction would be counterproductive. This is likely a minority view, which is fine. The problem is that those changes can be implemented by exchequer on short notice without community involvement, which creates the appearance of centralization.
I therefore would suggest a SIP along those lines:
SIP-XXXX
The SOV rewards rate for trading and lending pools is suggested by Exchequer after consultation with Circle of tokens.
Whenever a new or changed rewards rate is suggested, it shall be brought before the Bitocracy for a yes/no vote.
If the Bitocracy votes no, the rewards rate remains unchanged.
If the Bitocracy votes yes, the rewards rate will be changed as suggested by Exchequer.
If a quorum is not reached, the rewards rate also will be changed as suggested by Exchequer, so as not to paralyze the decision making capability of the protocol.
To avoid a multitude of proposals to overwhelm the Bitocracy, any number of changes can be bundled in one proposal.
If several changes are bundled, they will be voted on as one in one yes/no vote as stated above.
As you see, the purpose of this is to advance decentralization by essentially giving the Community a veto right, without paralyzing the decision making process. If the community members do not care enough to vote in sufficient number on a particular change, the rate will adjust as recommended by Exchequer. Also, Exchequer retains the sole right to recommend rate changes, to avoid clogging up the Bitocracy with multiple opposing community proposals.
This veto right would in my opinion further advance the cause of decentralization.
Your input would be greatly appreciated.