I have read your posts on Sovryn Dojo and I do agree with some of the things you have said there and also what the community has observed.
I think that in this current form the SIP is covering both the terms of the sales and also leads to a collaboration between Core Sovryn and Mintlayer devs.
It might be better to split this SIP into two discussions. First one that would cover sales , allocation and airdrops and a second that will present the terms of collaboration and I feel that there is need to negotiate the terms a little more in depth because the terms presented in this SIP are a little vague and open to interpretation, and probably it was left as such deliberately just to open the conversation, but i do feel that we need to get to more concrete terms.
Just to expand further on the ideas i layed in my earlier post about the terms of the sales:
I think that having the same vesting terms as the VC’s is good and I am greatfull for that.
Staking requirements i fell are very clear and they make sense to me.
I feel that the Airdop should change slightly so that every voluntary staker(vesing sov to be excluded) is included regardless of stake size and time staked and the amount received by a staker should be proportional to the voting power(size+time).
Because this would mean more stakers than your first proposal i would increase the size of MLT airdropped. Maybe add the amount of MLT left unsold in the fair sale!?!?, though this might create some misaligned incentives!?!?
I do feel there is tremendous value in having Sovryn on both sidechains.